Garland showed 48% three point shooting over his first four games, which was a continuation of an unbelievable spring he'd had at camps. He also had a profile that is way more appealing to scouts as a lead ballhandler/off-the-dribble shooter.
I know you're only arguing for Stanley as a fringe first round pick (which I'm not saying is impossible). But I haven't heard a lot of buzz about him moving up draft boards, and it seems less likely to happen now. Maybe he'll either come back and impress in our first round loss of the NIT or grade out well at combines.