- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 42,355
Yeah this is one of those arguments you have to be a homer about because the other side is just so stupid about it.
Duke isn't going to schedule games in some mediocre opponent's home arena like Long Beach State, UNC Greensboro or St. John's when they can sell out the United Center, MSG, Barclays and Greensboro Coliseum. What incentive is there to change this?
There is all the financial, recruiting, NCAA seeding, NCAA Tournament experience and general incentive in the world to play at MSG rather than some small arena on someone else's campus. Duke isn't going to choose to hurt its own program. It's going to make more money, recruit better players with more exposure, get a better seed in the Tournament, and get better experience playing in a large, marquee, neutral arena before the Tournament when it can easily choose to do so.
Duke isn't going to schedule games in some mediocre opponent's home arena like Long Beach State, UNC Greensboro or St. John's when they can sell out the United Center, MSG, Barclays and Greensboro Coliseum. What incentive is there to change this?
There is all the financial, recruiting, NCAA seeding, NCAA Tournament experience and general incentive in the world to play at MSG rather than some small arena on someone else's campus. Duke isn't going to choose to hurt its own program. It's going to make more money, recruit better players with more exposure, get a better seed in the Tournament, and get better experience playing in a large, marquee, neutral arena before the Tournament when it can easily choose to do so.