Pantone287
Legend
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 13,412
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Funny, because they only essentially played 6 in most of the second half minus a few minutes of Blakes. Roach, Proctor, Mitchell, Flip, Lively, Youngbut they need to find those top 7 guys and cut the rest out of games like this.
Funny, because they only essentially played 6 in most of the second half minus a few minutes of Blakes. Roach, Proctor, Mitchell, Flip, Lively, Youngbut they need to find those top 7 guys and cut the rest out of games like this.
Funny, because they only essentially played 6 in most of the second half minus a few minutes of Blakes. Roach, Proctor, Mitchell, Flip, Lively, Youngbut they need to find those top 7 guys and cut the rest out of games like this.
That's an absolutely disgusting top 7, though. Ideally, all of these guys prove to be good at what they're supposed to be good at:
PG Proctor
SG Roach
SF Whitehead
PF Filipowski
C Lively
Bench - Mitchell, Grandison, Blakes (0.5 guy)
We can if we keep playing all our bigs at the same time48% OREB% tonight, basically the same as last game. Surely we can't keep this up.
Maybe we can if we play gigantic lineups. But there's a tradeoff, as we've seen.48% OREB% tonight, basically the same as last game. Surely we can't keep this up.
I'm not sure if it's 4 of 5. But I do count three we could have/should have won: late 2016 when Frank Mason sank that buzzer beater; 2018 Elite Eight; and this.Think that’s 4/5 they’ve won now