childress22
All American
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2012
- Messages
- 7,977
We outrebounded them! It was by one damn defensive rebound, but we outrebounded them.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!rome8180 said:His whole press conference kind of sounds like Trump-speak. Fascist.
SeanMayTriedToEatMe said:The poor 3pt shooting is mainly on the regression by Allen and Jones as shooters from last season. We knew we couldn't count on Jackson or Tatum to be great 3pt shooters this season, and Kennard's expected improvement has balanced the freshmen out anyway. Allen and Jones have killed the offensive efficiency with unexpectedly bad 3pt shooting, but there is reason for optimism if you want to be a Duke homer.
Allen 3pt%, last season: 42%
Allen 3pt%, this season: 34%
Allen 3pt%, last 3 games: 45% (13-29)
Jones 3pt%, last season: 42%
Jones 3pt%, this season: 34%
Jones 3pt%, last 9 games: 40% (17-43)
Those season percentages aren't typos - Allen and Jones have had practically the exact same regression as shooters. If you want to continue to believe in this Duke team, you can look at what these two players did last season and look at what they've done lately, and conclude that they will both in the low 40s% from 3 for the rest of the season. If we normalize Allen and Jones to be 40% 3pt shooters all season, it results in 16 extra made 3s, or 48 extra points (but we need to lower that "extra points" number a bit to account for 33% offensive rebounding by Duke). Call it 43 extra points, or slightly less than 2 extra points per game. 2 extra points per game would put Duke at #6 instead of #14 in offensive efficiency (dividing by Duke's average of 70 possessions per game).
So if all we did was have Allen and Jones shoot at bottom end of their expected ranges all season, fixing nothing else about the offense through better shot selection, better play calling, better usage distribution, etc., then the offense would be #6 in the country and good enough to contend for a title.
All of this thought process would be reasonable if we also believe the major difference between last season's offense and this season's offense is NOT the reduced spacing from having Tatum at the 4 instead of the better-shooting Ingram or using a Tatum+2 bigs lineup a lot, or other more meta problems with the offensive scheme or blend of players this season. I tend to believe it really isn't a spacing problem, since the 2010 team hit 3s just fine and Allen and Jones aren't taking very many contested and/or off-the-dribble 3s. Oh, and Kennard is making 46% of his 3s in the same offense that Allen and Jones are being forced to suffer through.
TLDR: Hit open 3s.