By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Rewatched the second half. I still think that’s an obvious technical on the TT big with 35 sec left. He deliberately smacks Roach well after the whistle. But no T. Just a review that ices our shooter in a single bonus.
Jesus, now Paolo is 10'2"
I kind of disagree. The play was dead and Roach went up for essentially a practice shot. He doesn’t have any right or expectation of protection in a dead ball situation like that. I kind of like the idea that if the offensive player is going to take a practice shot attempt, the defensive player can take a practice block attempt.Rewatched the second half. I still think that’s an obvious technical on the TT big with 35 sec left. He deliberately smacks Roach well after the whistle. But no T. Just a review that ices our shooter in a single bonus.
That was bullshit. In my mind, the refs figured Duke was safely ahead and didn't want to deal with the idiotic college basketball fans that would point to that correct call as "DOOK GETS ALL TEH CALLS!!1!"
I kind of disagree. The play was dead and Roach went up for essentially a practice shot. He doesn’t have any right or expectation of protection in a dead ball situation like that. I kind of like the idea that if the offensive player is going to take a practice shot attempt, the defensive player can take a practice block attempt.Rewatched the second half. I still think that’s an obvious technical on the TT big with 35 sec left. He deliberately smacks Roach well after the whistle. But no T. Just a review that ices our shooter in a single bonus.
That was bullshit. In my mind, the refs figured Duke was safely ahead and didn't want to deal with the idiotic college basketball fans that would point to that correct call as "DOOK GETS ALL TEH CALLS!!1!"
The foul is the issue, but I don’t think there’s a good answer there. If it had been a more serious foul, I’d be curious to hear what the “expert ref” would say.
^^^^
this validates my eye test they made some bullshit over Mark in the 2H. But man we kill ourselves giving away so many points off live ball turnovers needlessly.
Admittedly, I was buzzed. But I didn’t see it that way in the moment. I want to see a replay for my own sake, but I trust your eyes. If it was someone like @rhfarmer saying this, I’d have to verify he had on his spectacles.@JohaadDBC I think slap’s reply said it best that TT’s big guy didn’t make any attempt on the ball. All he did was blatantly smack a guy in the gut. If it had been a live ball, it would have been a flagrant 1. Should have been a dead ball technical.
I kind of disagree. The play was dead and Roach went up for essentially a practice shot. He doesn’t have any right or expectation of protection in a dead ball situation like that. I kind of like the idea that if the offensive player is going to take a practice shot attempt, the defensive player can take a practice block attempt.
The foul is the issue, but I don’t think there’s a good answer there. If it had been a more serious foul, I’d be curious to hear what the “expert ref” would say.
This is a bad take.I kind of disagree. The play was dead and Roach went up for essentially a practice shot. He doesn’t have any right or expectation of protection in a dead ball situation like that. I kind of like the idea that if the offensive player is going to take a practice shot attempt, the defensive player can take a practice block attempt.Rewatched the second half. I still think that’s an obvious technical on the TT big with 35 sec left. He deliberately smacks Roach well after the whistle. But no T. Just a review that ices our shooter in a single bonus.
That was bullshit. In my mind, the refs figured Duke was safely ahead and didn't want to deal with the idiotic college basketball fans that would point to that correct call as "DOOK GETS ALL TEH CALLS!!1!"
The foul is the issue, but I don’t think there’s a good answer there. If it had been a more serious foul, I’d be curious to hear what the “expert ref” would say.
This is a bad take.I kind of disagree. The play was dead and Roach went up for essentially a practice shot. He doesn’t have any right or expectation of protection in a dead ball situation like that. I kind of like the idea that if the offensive player is going to take a practice shot attempt, the defensive player can take a practice block attempt.Rewatched the second half. I still think that’s an obvious technical on the TT big with 35 sec left. He deliberately smacks Roach well after the whistle. But no T. Just a review that ices our shooter in a single bonus.
That was bullshit. In my mind, the refs figured Duke was safely ahead and didn't want to deal with the idiotic college basketball fans that would point to that correct call as "DOOK GETS ALL TEH CALLS!!1!"
The foul is the issue, but I don’t think there’s a good answer there. If it had been a more serious foul, I’d be curious to hear what the “expert ref” would say.
Woah, calm down boys. I imagine you guys should know that I don’t play the contrarian just to do so.I kind of disagree. The play was dead and Roach went up for essentially a practice shot. He doesn’t have any right or expectation of protection in a dead ball situation like that. I kind of like the idea that if the offensive player is going to take a practice shot attempt, the defensive player can take a practice block attempt.
The foul is the issue, but I don’t think there’s a good answer there. If it had been a more serious foul, I’d be curious to hear what the “expert ref” would say.
Are you just wanting to be contrarian for no reason in particular? Since when can you physically impede an opposing player's movement just because the play is blown dead?