By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Maybe I'm wrong, but I don't think it's uncommon to face guard a hot shooter, and I would argue it's actually simpler than reading the defense and angles. Just stick on him and follow him wherever he goes. As you trail him around a screen, you know you have Mark and Paolo sagging to help on anything inside; just don't give up a look from three.
The problem is Moore doesn't stick with Cattoor. As Cattoor cuts around the screen, Moore turns his back on Cattoor - not only losing sight of his man, but also taking himself completely out of position to get around the screen. There was no reason at all to turn inside. Tech doesn't run curls into the paint, and even if they did there was no spacing on this play for it.
I think Moore is just bad off ball on defense. He turns his back on his man too much without actually having some sort of a read on how to blow the play up, and he doesn't fight through screens.
Ya but you all also used peach baskets
No worries. Our ACCT defense effectively neutralized the backdoor cut threat at the expense of giving up open 3s. As long as Davidson can't hit 3s, we're fine.How vulnerable do you think this particular defense is to getting beat by McKillop's backdoor cuts? My sense had been that they're less committed to jumping the passing lanes like in prior years but there are obviously still some major issues as you guys are detailing (really well).
I'm not advocating for all out face guarding, but I don't think it's hard to execute and I don't think it's a bad idea to use against a team whose main threat is outside shooting and who has a few especially good shooters. Especially on Cattoor with the night he was having.The last play Childress posted is pretty much just bad awareness and effort by Moore. I don't think I'd agree that faceguarding all over the court is generally a wise strategy though, precisely because it's so easy to get picked off by screens anywhere at any time. This is kind of the same root issue as when Larranaga used to kill us with halfcourt ballscreens that we would inexplicably hit and try to fight over, except off the ball and moved to the corner of the court. Same silly philosophy of being 6 inches from your man's face even in situations where that's easily exploited.
And it may be simpler in theory, but that doesn't equal more effective or easier to execute in practice. You can't follow someone around a screen if you don't see it coming, and going over isn't always a viable path to stay tight. Plus, there's just more room for error when you cut off a wider swath of space from the ball than if you try to stay perfectly positioned right in front of your man's face at all times, all else equal. Takes less effort too.
“That’s not the biggest problem, though. The issues Krzyzewski and his staff are working to correct include guards like Trevor Keels, Jeremy Roach or Wendell Moore, Jr., not closing out on shooters to make them uncomfortable. It’s those same players getting caught up in screens despite the switches.”
edited to add “”
“That’s not the biggest problem, though. The issues Krzyzewski and his staff are working to correct include guards like Trevor Keels, Jeremy Roach or Wendell Moore, Jr., not closing out on shooters to make them uncomfortable. It’s those same players getting caught up in screens despite the switches.”
This was also made possible by an obvious moving screen by Cattoor to block Moore from being able to switch. I hate how uncalled those are now in the NBA and college, and that if Moore tries to fight through it's more likely to be a defensive foul than offensive.Here are some more clips I created of Duke's defense.
In this clip below, Mark does a better job than in the clip I posted in my previous post in drop copverage. He's able to get into Murphy here by being low and meeting him closer to the screen. This takes away the pull-up and forces the drive. Keels does a horrible job getting over- this is lazy- to the point where they have to switch- Mark onto Murphy, and Keels onto the screener. This next action VT runs becomes nearly indefensible with Mark on the switch to Murphy. VT runs the down screen in the corner immediately after Mark gets switched onto Murphy. Moore is naturally calling for the switch, because I'm assuming Duke is switching all off-ball screens in their gameplan. Switching this is extremely difficult, if not impossible, with Mark now switched onto Murphy because it's a brutal cover for him and not something he often does. Moore switches, Mark is late, Duke gets roasted.
âï¸ defense
20 seconds · Clipped by MrCoolguy234 · Original video "Duke vs Virginia Tech | 2022.3.12 | NCAAB Game" by The Draftmaticyoutube.com