Devilsforlife
Legend
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2017
- Messages
- 11,309
Yep, that team was undefeated at home. K‘s last team to run the table at Cameron, shockingly.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!In fairness, they dominated notre dame during that gameI'd have to look, but this may be a worse defensive stretch than 2014 ever had. I figured I'd move the defense talk out of the Pomeroy thread.
November 1st to December 1st - 36th rated defense
December 1st to January 1st - 110th rated defense
January 1st to February 1st - 14th rated defense
February 1st to March 1st - 63rd rated defense
March 1st to now - 206th rated defense
Our defense hasn't been great all year, to be honest. Even that January number is only lifted up by a historically bad offensive performance from Notre Dame. In retrospect, I'm not sure how much our defense had to do with than one game either. If you remove it, our defense falls to 41st for that month.
This was one of the worst 7 days I can remember in recent Duke history. There's good reason to assume we are losing in the first weekend. But I do want to note the lack of correlation between ACCT results and tourney results post-2010. For example:
ACCT championships:
2011, looked great in ACCT: Barely beat Michigan on last possession in R2, blown out in round 3
2017, incredible run in the ACCT: Second round debacle against South Carolina
2019, wins ACCT: Looks like ass in NCAAT. Probably should've lost to UCF in round 2.
Best tournaments since 2010:
2013: Lost first game to Maryland in ACCT. Cruise to the E8 with wins against good Creighton and MSU teams before running into the best team in L'Ville
2015: Good first game in ACCT, horrible effort against ND. Won NCAAT
2018: ACC- Disgusting loss to UNC in Brooklyn in semifinals. Cruised through first weekend, beat Syracuse for third time that year in E8 in closer game. Probably should've been in F4, even more so than 2019.
This is it. This talk of "it's just impossible to guard VT and what are we supposed to do with this genius action" remains unconvincing to me. They scored 59 against Clemson, 57 against UNC, 63 against Boston College, 63 against NC State, etc.Sometimes I feel like we're the abused woman who's had it so bad for so long that we forget that there are fundamentally different ways to exist.
After watching more of VT running that play, I think the fix is basically to switch sooner, and have the defender who's guarding the DHO man (always Aluma) step out. As soon as Aluma/Mutts get into position for the right-side double curl screen, Our big should be ready to step out past the second screener and hedge Catoor toward the sideline, not allowing him to complete the curl. Short of that, you just have to guard him closer.I think Duke has the right defensive coverage for that play. Wendell is in a great position to cover his man around the screens while Banchero covers the backdoor.
Thanks -- I just deleted that post before I saw yours since it seemed tangential and my next post was so long, but I didn't know that. It just looked ridiculous on that play to see Mark angling his body to have the defender drive baseline... and then to have the guy get a layup.@childress22 not to nitpick, but funneling to the baseline is more "current" than funneling to the middle in NBA, high major hoops. UVa doesn't do this, so there's examples of teams that play different M2M principles but your larger point still stands.