By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
SignUp Now!Yeah, the "trust" thing is baffling. There's always one, and usually only one, player who is "sub elite" who gets so much grace that it's inexplicable. Honestly, it makes the inequality of playing time that much more difficult to explain. Like, if you are obviously willing to play Matt Jones extended minutes during stretches where he was fucking shockingly awful, it undermines the whole process. It says, "if you are an elite recruit, I will play you no matter what. If you are the one guy that I irrationally trust who isn't an elite recruit, I will play you no matter what. If you are better than the one guy, but not elite, I won't play you no matter what"Oh, I agree with that. I think it fits in with K not wanting to suffer sub-elite play in the current season. If each season could potentially be your last, why take the time to develop kids who might be valuable two years from now when you know you can win riding the studs you already have.
Also, IMO part of it is just Coach K's "trust" thing. Some guys who don't even seem to be that good earn his trust very early on. Some guys never earn it. Maybe it's as simple as communicating and rotating correctly on defense. Maybe it's a practice thing that we'll never see. I don't know, but that's my perception as an outsider anyway.
We made David McCormack's Final Six. So there's that.
Oh, I agree with that. I think it fits in with K not wanting to suffer sub-elite play in the current season. If each season could potentially be your last, why take the time to develop kids who might be valuable two years from now when you know you can win riding the studs you already have.
Also, IMO part of it is just Coach K's "trust" thing. Some guys who don't even seem to be that good earn his trust very early on. Some guys never earn it. Maybe it's as simple as communicating and rotating correctly on defense. Maybe it's a practice thing that we'll never see. I don't know, but that's my perception as an outsider anyway.
We made David McCormack's Final Six. So there's that.
Is he the chunky one? Maybe he could be K's final Jiggy Hairston.
That's fair, and I appreciate that.@AxeS24, we'll tolerate a lot of shit here, but we won't let dumbassery go unchecked. I suggest you go back and reevaluate that 2010 season and come back once you've been properly educated.
You are much more likely to win a national championship with a team full of OAD studs like '12 Kentucky or '15 Duke.
That's fair, and I appreciate that.@AxeS24, we'll tolerate a lot of shit here, but we won't let dumbassery go unchecked. I suggest you go back and reevaluate that 2010 season and come back once you've been properly educated.
I don't view my comments as disparaging. I at least didn't intend that. "Lightning in a bottle" was meant to convey that it is unlikely to recruit that many quality guys who are going to stay 3-4 years like that team did. Scheyers and Nolan Smiths don't grow on trees, especially these days. You are much more likely to win a national championship with a team full of OAD studs like '12 Kentucky or '15 Duke.
The path comment is indefensible and fake news and I am ashamed I typed it. I will self-ban for a few days- just wanted to defend my "lightning in a bottle" comment.